Compare
Side-by-side pages, each with the facts checked on a date or measured on the production fleet: cdpfleet against other cloud-browser services, one of our browsers against another, and one browser version against the one before it.
Other services
- cdpfleet vs BrowserbaseTwelve real browsers over Playwright or CDP with your own proxies, or Chromium over CDP with built-in proxies, Stagehand and captcha solving. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs BrowserlessThe longest-running headless-browser service against a browser fleet: 30-second "units" with 2–60-minute session caps and proxies by the megabyte, or threads metered per second with your own proxies and 24-hour sessions. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs SteelThe open-source browser API for agents against a browser fleet: per-minute Chromium with proxies, captcha solves and a 15-minute-to-24-hour session cap by plan, or twelve real browsers metered per second with your own proxies. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs Browser Use CloudThe cheapest per-hour cloud browser for AI agents against a fleet of real browsers: one stealth Chromium over CDP at $0.02/hour plus traffic fees, or twelve browsers over Playwright or CDP with free traffic through your own proxies. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs HyperbrowserA credits-based cloud Chrome with stealth, captcha solving and AI agents against a fleet of twelve real browsers: $0.10/hour plus $10/GB for its proxies (your own proxy on Enterprise only), or flat threads with free traffic through any proxy. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs Cloudflare Browser Run (Browser Rendering)Cloudflare's serverless headless Chromium — formerly Browser Rendering — against a fleet of twelve real browsers: $0.09/hour beyond 10 free hours plus concurrency fees, Cloudflare exit IPs that are always flagged as bot traffic and no proxies, or flat threads with any proxy and headful real browsers.
- cdpfleet vs Anchor BrowserAn agent-focused cloud Chromium with captcha solving, managed logins and US hosting against a fleet of twelve real browsers: per-browser and per-hour fees plus $0.20/GB even through your own proxy (higher plans only), or flat threads with free traffic through any proxy. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs KernelA sandboxed cloud Chromium for agents, billed per second with free standby, against a fleet of twelve real browsers on flat threads: $0.06/hour headless but $0.48/hour headful there, your own proxies only from the $200/month plan, versus free traffic through any proxy here. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs ZenRowsThe ZenRows Browser — cloud Chrome over CDP, always on its residential proxies, 15-minute sessions, billed in credits per minute and per GB — and its Fetch, Crawl and Batch APIs, against a fleet of twelve real browsers on flat threads with free traffic through any proxy, and cdpfleet Functions.
- cdpfleet vs ApifyA browser you connect to from your own code, priced per thread, against a platform that runs your whole scraper — Actors in containers, billed in compute units with proxies and storage — and its Store of ready-made Actors for fetching, crawling and search. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs AirtopA fleet of real browsers you drive with Playwright, priced per thread with published rates, against a cloud browser for AI agents billed in credits whose rates aren't published. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs NotteA fleet of real browsers you drive with Playwright from five languages, against a browser platform for AI agents with Chromium sessions, serverless functions, scraping, page monitors and credentials in one place. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs Bright Data Browser APIA fleet of real browsers you drive with Playwright, paid per browser-second, against Bright Data's Browser API (formerly Scraping Browser): a managed unblocking Chrome paid per GB — and its Web Unlocker, Fetch, SERP and Scraper APIs against cdpfleet Functions. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs Oxylabs Agent BrowserA fleet of real browsers you drive with Playwright, paid per browser-second, against Oxylabs' Agent Browser (formerly Unblocking Browser): a managed Chromium with residential proxies, paid per GB — and its Web API search and scrape endpoints against cdpfleet Functions. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs ScrapflyScrapfly's Cloud Browser (one patched Chromium over CDP, sessions up to 30 minutes, credits per 30 s and per MB) and its Scrape, Screenshot and Crawler APIs, against twelve real browsers on flat threads and cdpfleet Functions. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs ScrapingBeeScrapingBee's web scraping API (one HTTPS request per page, rendered in a headless browser, 1–75 credits by proxy tier, no browser to connect to) and its search and site APIs, against twelve real browsers you drive on flat threads and cdpfleet Functions. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs ZyteZyte API's managed headless browser over CDP (sessions up to 1 hour, billed per 15 s at the target site's price tier, paid plan and business verification required) and its scraping API (HTTP or browser-rendered requests in five price tiers, AI extraction, Scrapy Cloud), against twelve real browsers on flat threads and cdpfleet Functions. Prices, limits and features side by side.
- cdpfleet vs NimbleNimble's Extract API (one request per URL through HTTP, headless, headful or stealth "drivers", $1.00 per 1,000 successful URLs, no browser to connect to) with Crawl, Map, Search and Extract Templates, against twelve real browsers you drive on flat threads and cdpfleet Functions. Prices, limits and features side by side.
Browser vs browser
- Camoufox vs Firefox, headlessHeadless Firefox and headless Camoufox (both based on Firefox source; not affiliated with Mozilla) side by side: the headless tells a page can read, what Camoufox hides, and what its "virtual" mode costs.
- Camoufox vs PatchrightTwo stealth browsers, two philosophies: a browser based on Firefox source (not affiliated with Mozilla) that spoofs the whole device at the C++ level, or a Chromium that patches the automation leaks and otherwise tells the truth. What each is like to drive, and what a site sees.
- Chrome vs BraveThe same Chromium 155 underneath, two very different faces: Brave calls itself Chrome in the user agent but Brave in the client hints, randomises cores, screen and canvas, sends Sec-GPC, drops a TLS extension and switches off Google's Topics and Fenced Frames.
- Chrome vs ChromiumGoogle's Chrome against the Chromium build Playwright ships: seven majors apart, one brand missing from the client hints, one TLS extension fewer — and, contrary to folklore, the same video codecs and DRM.
- Chrome vs EdgeTwo real Chromium browsers on the fleet, measured side by side: identical engine, identical HTTP/2 and header order, and exactly three things a site can tell apart — the user-agent token, the client-hint brand and one TLS extension.
- Edge vs BraveTwo Chromium 155 forks with the same TLS and HTTP/2 fingerprint: Edge names itself in the user agent and reports its real machine; Brave hides in the user agent but not the client hints, farbles cores, memory and screen, and drops Topics and Fenced Frames.
- Firefox vs CamoufoxPlaywright's Firefox build against the anti-detect fork built on it (both based on Firefox source; not affiliated with Mozilla): what Camoufox changes in what a site sees, what it costs you as a developer, and when plain Firefox is the better tool.
- Opera vs ChromeOpera 137 runs on Chromium 153, two majors behind Chrome 155, and names itself everywhere — OPR in the user agent, Opera in the client hints — while its TLS, HTTP/2 and header order are byte-for-byte Chrome's. What that means for driving it and for how sites see it.
- Patchright vs RebrowserTwo stealth-patched Chromium builds that look the same to a site — same TLS and HTTP/2 fingerprints, no webdriver, no Runtime.enable leak — but Patchright is Chromium 148 on today's Playwright, and Rebrowser is Chromium 136 pinned to Playwright 1.52.
- WebKit vs ChromiumPlaywright's WebKit 26.4 claims a Mac in its user agent but reports Linux, sets navigator.webdriver and speaks HTTP/1.1 through a proxy. Where it beats Chromium (CSS, testing), and why it is not an iPhone's browser.
- WebKit vs the Safari it claims to bePlaywright's WebKit 26.4 sends a Mac Safari 26.4 user agent, but reports Linux x86_64, sets navigator.webdriver, offers only HTTP/1.1, renders with Linux fonts and has no WebGPU — while already exposing CSS from Safari 27.0. What it is good for, and every place a page can see it isn't Safari on a Mac or an iPhone.
- Naver Whale vs ChromeWhale 5.41 runs on Chromium 156, one major behind Chrome 157, names itself in the user agent and client hints, and now sends the same TLS hello as Chrome. What that means for driving it and for how sites see it.
- Yandex Browser vs ChromeYandex Browser 26.8 runs on Chromium 150, six majors behind Chrome 156, names itself in the user agent and client hints, puts Russian first in navigator.languages and sends a TLS hello one extension short of Chrome's.
Version vs version
- Brave beta vs stableBrave's beta channel next to stable on the fleet. Right now the beta is the older engine: Brave 1.100 beta is on Chromium 156, while 1.99 stable already moved to Chromium 157. TLS and HTTP/2 are identical, and five web APIs differ.
- Camoufox 152 vs Camoufox 150Both claim Firefox 152 and send the same TLS fingerprint — but on 152 Playwright's evaluate and init scripts run in an isolated world the page can't see, while on 150 they run in the page's own world.
- Chrome 154 vs Chrome 153What changed between the two Chrome majors on the fleet — new features, removals, the new HTTP warning and why automated sessions don't see it — and which of it a site can use to tell a browser's version, or to tell that the version is a lie.
- Chrome 155 vs Chrome 154Chrome 155 on the fleet: four web features a page can detect, the same TLS and HTTP/2 fingerprint as 154, and release-note features sessions don't get.
- Chrome 156 (beta) vs Chrome 154Two majors ahead of stable, measured on the fleet: what 155 and 156 add and remove, which of it a page can already detect in the beta, what is identical on the wire, and what you can set before 156 ships.
- Edge 156 (beta) vs Edge 155Edge's beta channel next to stable on the fleet: two CSS features a page can detect, a reordered client-hint brand list, and the same TLS and HTTP/2 fingerprint.
- Opera developer vs stableOpera's developer channel next to stable on the fleet. Both are on Chromium 155, so the web platform and the TLS and HTTP/2 fingerprint are identical. What gives the developer build away is the "(Edition developer)" suffix in its user agent.